Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Red Beard's avatar

I've dug into a good amount of peptide literature, and it's not great. The studies are sparse, the controls aren't very good, and of course the lack of human trials is apparent. Many effects most people talk about being "shown in research" are extreme extrapolations. With that said, the possibilities are promising - IF the mechanisms actually work the way they are theorized too. With that said... I've taken a BPC-157 + TB500 stack for a SIJ ligament sprain, and although I was doing many other modalities I am confident to say it helped. I think the key is that if you are going to use peptides DYOR, understand the risk, and most importantly test your own tolerance. There is just not enough data to have 'protocols' so start with suggested use and modify based on your reactions. For research purposes, of course

Expand full comment
Cheese's avatar

My understanding on HGH was that it was different in that it was a replacement dose instead of peptides which stimulate your own body to release GH.

My question is why bother with anything else when HGH does everything a peptide can do?

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts