32 Comments
User's avatar
Ai Bro's avatar

Some ideas for the noobs:

Help niche services get customers by doing their marketing for them

Run affiliates offers for skin, weight loss.

Start a skin or weight loss product

Start a software (SaaS) product targeting a service niche or w/e

All this is much easier than it seems (just start). You’ll suck and then learn, then wonder why you didn’t start sooner.

Make 50 calls, someone will take you up on it. Run a ton of shitty affiliates you’ll learn what works. It’s actually really fun.

Expand full comment
BowTied Hippo's avatar

Cartoon Bull from 2035 doing a better job than a 28k USTT accountancy qualification...

Expand full comment
Ai Bro's avatar

Notice how bull spelled it. I agree they won’t need (redacted)

Expand full comment
BowTied Bull's avatar

> He Knows

Expand full comment
Ai Bro's avatar

Si

Expand full comment
0xJeff's avatar

Awesome, might be a good time to learn to use it for cheaper than normal.

Expand full comment
Hank Havana's avatar

Google has their own cloud business so cant be data centers

Expand full comment
Hank Havana's avatar

“Rely” too… Apple is one one that makes their own chips and less silicon seems intuitive. But… a little bird told me that ain’t it.

Expand full comment
BowTiedAccountant's avatar

Highly endorse this. This is better than your first semester an Intro to Finance class in Uni

Simply - sales growth is more important than just the gross numbers, understanding pricing power, operating expenses - are key areas for evaluating an income statement

Must read for all non finance jungle members

Expand full comment
Michael's avatar

Is there any hope for a fast-casual restaurant operator? I started a concept a few years ago with a buddy in Buffalo, NY (after moving home from NYC) and it's sort of like a Digg Inn. I'll spare you a long post but there's no question that the restaurant biz is the stupidest biz you can be in. Insane volatility, and so many independent moving parts with immediate high stakes. We also sell meal preps online.. that biz seems more hopeful for the future. But if any of you are thinking of opening a small restaurant... just don't. Anyway, just a small operator having daily heart attacks looking at the cost of his chicken prices here. Godspeed.

Expand full comment
Mike D's avatar

no longer needed: monster/indeed/recruiting software/firms

Expand full comment
BowTied Bull's avatar

Hmm probably true, if you have an audience you can just post a position on social media

Expand full comment
sift's avatar

Thanks for the post and bluntly motivating delivery.

It's frustrating how many people focus on volume and revenue - profitability second. In the hotel industry I come across is a lot, and find it so short-sighted. Once you consistently lower rate to get more volume you diminish the price-position/perception, and its rough to get back. Plus when you max out occupancy where do you expect to grow? So you work harder not smarter for market share, and have little opportunity for growth in future years since you took away your own value and maxed out inventory. I know perishable products are different, but see some parallels.

Expand full comment
sift's avatar

Just realized I am still only thinking of profitability like a pleb and not NOI like an owner...

Expand full comment
BowTied Bull's avatar

This is interesting essentially you're capped at the room max, never got into this but if you look at RE you're trying to maximize for square footage (guess) when it comes to this type of biz

Wonder how hotels vs. Airbnb will do the next couple years

Expand full comment
sift's avatar

I left out an important point - I am referring to luxury/lifestyle hotels, which asset managers typically do not want to run higher than 85% occupancy because of wear and tear and service level impact, plus to gain share the following year maxing out occupancy puts more pressure on rate. Full/limited service hotels max on occupancy. Hotel management companies get fees on topline revenue, so can be at odds with ownership NOI goals at times. Hotels do not look at square footage except for meeting space ratio to room count, and use key count for rooms. Suites are used to drive premiums for rate, but when you start looking by square footage it gets clunky. So if you see hotel property sales it is listed as price per key.

I think high end luxury hotels and high end airbnb will continue to do well, and the midlevel product for both may suffer for leisure, reflective of the middle class losing discretionary income. Areas I am familiar with have cracked down on short term rental licenses. Resorts have added managing that type of inventory into a revenue share program with the property owner. If you look at what type of hotels Blackstone invests in you see that spread - high end luxury/resort or supply chain hotels, nothing really in between.

Expand full comment
sift's avatar

we do look at square feet when looking at breaking up suites for more keys, or combining keys for more suites. This is at least my experience.

Hotels have a greater opportunity to recover for corporate travel and group/meetings/events business, you see it in NYC/SF/Silicon Valley already - so on an aggregate I think hotels will out perform and offset the slowdown in mid-level leisure. If I had to guess right now...

Expand full comment
Natty Hodler's avatar

If you actually found value from this article, your NGMI (never).

Expand full comment
Anotha Normie's avatar

Plenty of people that offer a great service but don’t understand optimizing their P&L. Not everyone is a finance geek. I’d argue that people trying to learn this WILL make it.

Great post for the inexperienced

Expand full comment
Northstar's avatar

Semiconductors?

Expand full comment
Pascal's avatar

I'm guessing this means ad budgets will get slashed in the near term.

Expand full comment
ap's avatar

Tangential to SNAP. Wonder if LINK is diluting earnings by over hiring and awarding shares. Or is this acceptable given their hyper growth state

Expand full comment
joe's avatar

Anyone that understood accounting/cash flow never liked Snap as an investment. Real investors just shake their heads at retail piling into Snap, but eventually it will need to turn a profit to survive. The time of zombie firms and rolling loans at 0% rates to fund VC burn is coming to a sudden end and cash flow matters again.

Expand full comment
BowTiedFrogger's avatar

no longer need their users cause their data is worthless for now?

Expand full comment
Shannon's avatar

FANG relies on trash cash printing—which will no longer be necessary.

Expand full comment
BowTiedGrey's avatar

Probably less marketing/advertising. Also companies that are struggling to grow may need to spend less on antitrust defense lawyers.

Expand full comment
Nunya Bidness's avatar

FANG won’t need OE, diversity coaches, or older admins whose productivity cuts in half every other year.

Expand full comment